Haiti: UN will go in and disarm them so they may never fight for their freedom again.

We sent 500 troops just so Aristide could skip town and escape to Africa, leaving them in anarchy. But just prior to that one base was in Lock Down waiting for orders, and sent in just 50 preceded by 4 advisors. I knew when they were just "thinking about it" it was already a done deal i.e. Liberia (where our battle ships were docked in open waters a month before our military went in). It's all just so farcical. In another picture, Philippe's BDUs looked American GI.

This will be a hay day for the globalist. The UN will go in and disarm them so they may never fight for their freedom again. The IMF (51% US ownership) will commandeer all their money and natural resources with contracts Haitians can't possibly honor i.e. Argentina. We will be able to pick another dictator puppet master for them, send in the capitalist to establish resort/casino businesses, but the people will remain poor and oppressed, and we will maintain our jumping off place for CIA/drug cartels. Iran-Contra never ended, it just goes by new code names. The International banksters would be out of business if their drug supplies were cut off. Hegelian Dialectic: Problem - Reaction - Solution.

That's why our CIA wants to overthrow Chavez, and after him again. It's all about OIL! They don't care about Communism, as by evidence of keeping Marxist Aristide in power. He was probably so drugged out, he was of little or no value any longer, or he wasn't playing along to get along.

***Listen to Atty. Kurzban. The rebels had armor piercing bullets, and sophisticated weaponry.

============= Don,

Don't be a sucker. I know many missionaries who lived in Haiti and I've followed Aristide since the 90's. He is international organized-crime.

Here are two letters I put out yesterday:

In friendship,

Dick Eastman

"I never consider a difference of opinion in politics, in religion, in philosophy, as cause for withdrawing from a friend." - Thomas Jefferson

Aristide was rescued so that he could not be brought to trial and reveal his connections with the China-Triad-PLA-CIA-Bush-Clinton drug distribution hub in Haiti. Clinton stepped in when the new elected Parliament began to investigate Aristides drug trade connections -- it was the fasted Clinton ever acted in foreign policy.

The drugs are critical to the plot to destabilize the US -- still happening according to the original blueprint drawn up by Zhou Enlai and the communist network of the 1950's, before the Sino-Soviet split -- but a strategy that continued past the "fall of communism" -- as the destablization strategy was very profitable just as a racket.

Aristede -- the man who favors "necklacing" is a monster -- the man the neo-cons accused Saddam and Mohammed Omar of being but were not.

Aristede was rescued to keep him quiet.

He may even end up on the board of the Dow, like Salinas of Mexico.

Dick Eastman Yakima

========== He was kidnapped for the same reason that Clinton rushed marines in to save his regime when the elected Parliament began investigating his connections to the drug hub of the Triads and the CIA -- it was the fastest Clinton ever acted.

The organized-crime establishment could not afford to prop up such a monster ( who favored "necklacing" opponents etc.) in an election year, nor could they afford to have him arrested and investigated by the enraged (and starved) populace -- so they took him from justice -- perhaps to join Mexico's Salinas as a board memeber of the Dow on Wall Street?

At any rate, they got THEIR man out ahead of the populist Sandanista-style uprising.

DOn't believe the mouthpieces of the drug establishment who tell you that getting rid of Aristede was Bush's or Wolfowitz's or Perle's idea -- he is the corporation establishment's man.

Did Your Legislator Vote To Kill U.S. Job Market?

formatting link
PHILADELPHIA -- February 29, 2004 -- TomFlocco.com -- Wide reports indicate that Washington politicians are purposefully bleeding away America's wealth, economic vitality, and high-paying or national security-oriented industrial jobs--forcing constituents to absorb costs of corporate financial and tax incentives which subsidize the loss of these jobs.. White House officials now refer to shipping American jobs overseas as a "new type of international trade," thus creating a federal "job deficit" to stand adjacent to its burgeoning trade and spending deficits. But questions remain whether families will decide to "outsource" legislators voting to reward corporations with cheap labor in exchange for campaign election contributions. See the links below to learn which congressional culprits are selling out America, either by sending jobs abroad or importing foreign workers to take them. Full Story

Reply to
Dick Eastman
Loading thread data ...

Hypocrisy by Democrats regarding Haiti

Democrats ranging from John Kerry all the way down to Al Sharpton are jumping on the bandwagon to criticize George W. Bush for inaction on Haiti. They are saying that the US should have sent in the troops to keep Jean-Bertrand Aristide in power.

However, those exact same Democrats are saying that George W. Bush should not have sent US Troops to Iraq or Afghanistan.

Would it have been better for US soldiers to die in Haiti or in Iraq?

Here are a few facts:

The Democrats always point out that Aristide was a priest. They neglect to mention that he was a Voodoo Priest. Small difference?

Aristide was elected and took power in Haiti in 1990. However, after one year of corrupt rule, he was overthrown by the military, who ruled until

1994. The military was perhaps not better than Aristide, but was not worse either.

In 1994, President Clinton, not swayed by allegations that Aristide was corrupt and a killer, sent in US Troops to restore Aristide to power. This has to be one of the worst examples of US intervention in foreign affairs.

Supporters of Aristide in the US, including Rep. Charles Rangel, say that we should have supported Aristide because he is an elected leader. They ignore the fact that he was elected in 2000 and the legislative term of office expired in January. Aristide had no plans to hold a new election and ruled by fiat. Haiti had become a one-man dictatorship.

They also ignore the fact that Haitians voted for Aristide because he was supported by the US Government and naturally the Haitians want to vote for a candidate that has US backing.

International observers reported that the 2000 election won by Aristide was rigged.

Haiti is the perfect example of a country where we should simply stay out of it and let the people there decide their own fate. We should not send our Marines or any troops there. Why do not Kerry, Bush or the rest of the gangs understand that?

Sam Sloan

920 Belmont Avenue Brooklyn NY 11208

(718) 277-6957

Reply to
Dick Eastman

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.