[OT] "Twenty five years of the IBM PC"

Aug 12, 2006 29 Replies

On Mon, 14 Aug 2006 20:44:45 +0100 'Tumbleweed' posted this onto uk.politics.misc:

I don't have a problem with that but you might like to consider that IBM's 'failure' to license the PC BIOS may in fact have been aided and abetted internally... bear in mind that the IBM PC was designed with an open architecture.

Well, I can remember using an ACT Sirius in the early '80's to program in dBase 2. How old does that make me?

And the IBM PC was FAR inferior to the Sirius and the Apricot.

Not so sure about an open architecture developing though. Too many competing companies all striving to make THEIR architecture the one of choice.

See my other post. You were involved with the Apricot? Nice machine. I used a Sirius, the predecessor, for some years.

It was an excellent machine, the Sirius. I went from a twin floppy version to a machine with a HUGE 10 meg hard drive! ;-)) Dunno how it ever got filled up!

Aha! Control Program / Monitor, often incorrectly referred to as Control Program for Microprocessors.

This thread is certainly dredging up old memories!

Ah yes I had a Sirius once as well! Not to mention an Apple IIe and an Amstrad PC1640!

The ugly truth is that the IBM standard won despite superior alternatives because "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM".

On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 08:45:52 +0100 'Tumbleweed' posted this onto uk.politics.misc:

Sometimes. ;-)

i agree with hummingbird - it did change everything

ignore them m8 - they're all ruckin idiots

prob all linux heads anyway

and all experts aged about 16 . . .

Join the Discussion

Have something to add? Share your thoughts — no account required.

Didn't find your answer?

Ask the community — no account required