I'm curious to see if other Quicken expatriates have decided to give Intuit another chance this year.
I'd been a loyal Quicken user since 1988 (at that time, Quicken was a DOS program, under the ChipSoft moniker); however, after the Macrovision/C-Dilla malware fiasco of TurboTax 2002, I became furious with Intuit and swore I would never have another piece of Intuit software on my computer. I immediately wiped every byte of Intuit software from my hard drive and switched to MS Money and TaxCut.
Well. here I am, after having used Microsoft Money for years 2003 through
2005, switching back to Quicken. I still don't like Intuit, but I can't deny that Quicken 2006 is much more suitable for my needs, and (overall) easier to use than MS Money.When I first switched, I didn't miss Quicken at all. In fact, I felt that Money was much better than Quicken in terms of online banking. I still feel that Money has the edge in this area.
It wasn't until Money 2005 that I started to notice issues. Money's default settings for transaction downloads resulted in constant (and very confusing) substitution of payee names and category assignments that really started to throw off my budgeting.
I've also observed that balancing bank accounts in Quicken is more straight-forward than in MS Money.
But, the one feature that tipped the scales and made me return to Quicken was the ability to attach digital images to individual transactions. Quicken included this feature a few years ago and I loved it, but Intuit dropped it from subsequent versions for some reason; however, now it's back.and so am I - for now. I also like the ability to attach notes to individual transactions, another excellent feature that I find myself using frequently.
Money 2006 doesn't have this capability.
It's early yet, but so far I am very pleased with Quicken 2006 and have had no problems with installation and making the switch back from MS Money 2005.