Chip & PIN - Bin the PIN.

Without a hint of irony, tasty chicken astounded uk.finance on 16 Feb 2004 by announcing:

They've had *a* system, yes. Only with debit cards, and only offline PIN.

And the USA are thinking about getting around to it, just not yet.

For Europe (and South Africa) there is already an interchange fee incentive, and the liability shift starts Jan next year. All Maestro cards, ATMs & POS terminals must be EMV compliant by then. Hardly a long, long time away.

For everywhere else except Canada & USA, the liability shift is Jan 2006.

Canada & USA have no decision yet on incentives & liability shift.

The long-term risk, then, is everyone flocking to the USA/Canada to use their cloned mag-stripe cards.

Reply to
Alex
Loading thread data ...

Without a hint of irony, snipped-for-privacy@isbd.co.uk astounded uk.finance on 16 Feb

2004 by announcing:

The current French debit card system, no. The French are also migrating to EMV, however.

So you're going to sell your bike, leathers & helmet just to try & claim a tenner back on your card?

See above ;-)

Reply to
Alex

"tasty chicken" wrote

... which is why they'd use a motorcycle helmet rather than a balaclava!!

Reply to
Tim

Chris Green wrote

Ermm - how much *can* you fit in that?? :-(

Reply to
Tim

Chris Green wrote

Of course, the easy way around this is to make it as illegal to wear a crash helmet while *not* on the motorcycle, as it is illegal not to wear it when

*on* the motorcycle...

Seeing people running around with crash helmets on their head should be as much of a suspicious activity as running around with stockings on their head!!

Reply to
Tim

20 litres or more. My previous (touring) bike used to get quite a lot more, the cashiers in the petrol stations often double checked the amount when I appeared to pay wearing a helmet.
Reply to
usenet

Why, it's as much discrimination as it was discrimination preventing Sikhs from wearing their turbans. How about security people who wear crash helmets for protection? How about cycle helmets? How about ordinary hats?

Reply to
usenet

"James" wrote

It sounds a little like you consider yourself to be one of the "weak-willed", and you are just making up other excuses for not wanting a PIN. Can't you just grow up instead?

"James" wrote

Well - what's the third hand for?!

"James" wrote

What message would that be? - That you are unconcerned with security, so perhaps they'd better withdraw your card?? ;-(

Reply to
Tim

Chris Green wrote

That may be a valid reason - which can easily be written into the law.

Chris Green wrote

Could be same rule as for motorcycle helmets - can be worn when on bike, not when off bike..

Chris Green wrote

"Ordinary hats" don't mask the wearers face, so I don't see a problem with them - do you?

Reply to
Tim

Actually, no. Most countries in the world use a PIN system that is broadly compatible with most other systems. The UK sticks out in this respect.

So how exactly will any introduction of PINs in the UK change this?

Good point. However, your motorbike has a license plate. And if it's not visible, or stolen, then you're breaking the law. If you're breaking the law, there's only a certain amount of security that the banks can employ without inconveniencing all the honest people. It's not about a perfect system: it's about risk management.

Conceded!

Squawk!

Reply to
tasty chicken

That'll be the least of their worries ...

:-)

Reply to
tasty chicken

None at all, provided that you agree to underwrite your losses.

OTOH those of us able to remember a four digit number will I suspect be happy with the system.

Reply to
Steve Firth

All the retailers that I have used in france witha chip+PIN system ahve a "shoe" that you put your hand into to type unseen.

Reply to
Steve Firth

Without a hint of irony, tasty chicken astounded uk.finance on 16 Feb 2004 by announcing:

The introduction is world-wide.

Reply to
Alex

Without a hint of irony, "Tim" astounded uk.finance on 16 Feb 2004 by announcing:

Cycle helmets, as a rule, do not hide the face either.

Reply to
Alex

Nor do turbans....

Regards, Far

Reply to
Far

Without a hint of irony, "Far" astounded uk.finance on 16 Feb 2004 by announcing:

I didn't say they did. Motorcycle helmets do, however.

Reply to
Alex

So you'll outlaw ordinary hats which mask the face but not those that don't? No chance! :-) Sort of indecent exposure backwards!

Reply to
usenet

I am very concerned about security, my security and the passing of liability for fraud on to me. PINS are good news for the banks and retailers but when credit card companies start chasing up their fraud losses due to PIN (missuse, or negligence), then a lot of victims will be treated as suspects.

If you didn't have a PIN with a credit card, and it should be your choice then you or hooded crooks wouldn't be able to withdraw cash.

Weak willed people maybe a bad term - vulnerable is probably a better choice. Anyway if your short of £500, just apply for a credit card, await your PIN, give it to a.n. other, and have them draw out money. A good albi would see you alright and then deny being negligent with your PIN.

PINS are being sent automatically without any thought for the disabled, or people with a short term memory - is this responsible? Shouldn't the banks be asking you if you want a PIN before automatic distribution.

I standby my original statement, Why should you want a PIN with a credit card if you don't wish to draw money at an ATM? It should be personal choice.

Reply to
James

Without a hint of irony, snipped-for-privacy@tiscali.co.uk (James) astounded uk.finance on 16 Feb 2004 by announcing:

The liability will not be passed on to you unless you accept the liability by being careless with your PIN.

The cash withdrawal facility should be able to be barred seperately. The PIN will be necessary to perform a transaction once the PIN bypass concession is removed - either by the retailer or the bank.

The choice is for you not to have a credit or debit card facility. Remember that the card is the bank's property, not yours. They are entitled to attempt to protect the use of that property as they see fit.

Reply to
Alex

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.