Chip and Pin - no more signatures

formatting link
Fraud involving the stealing and counterfeiting of debit and credit cards has fallen 29% year-on-year in 2005, a banking body has said. ... But the figures are incomplete as they do not include card fraud over the telephone or internet. ... In addition, the figures do not include fraud committed when cards go missing in the post. ... Precise figures for these types of card fraud will be released next month.

----

I probably could have waited until next month then, to be honest. The story continues:

----- Apacs announced that the banks and retailers, in a bid to tighten the net on fraudsters, had agreed to make it harder for consumers with chip and pin cards to pay for goods in shops without using their pin.

During the introductory period of the chip and pin system, if cardholders do not know their pin number, retailers have been able to accept a signature, after first checking with the card issuer.

From 14 February 2006, banks and chip and pin functioning retailers

have decided to curtail this facility.

"Customers can expect to be asked for a different method of payment if they don't have their pin number," an Apacs spokeswoman told BBC News.

-----

This is bound to upset some people. I think the loved ones of disabled people are going to have to go with Valentines Day presents next year!

Reply to
Poldie
Loading thread data ...

Well DUH!

This story is about the chip and pin system, a system designed to prevent fraud in face-to-face transactions where signatures would normally be required. The figures quoted are for the kind of fraud chip and pin can prevent.

I mean, is that not obvious!

If anyone is making out that the wool is being pulled over anyones eyes, they are mistaken.

Reply to
Biscit

Er... no. The loved ones of very forgetful people yes, but is forgetfullness a disability?

Reply to
Biscit

Not at all. There are ways in which figures can be misleading, especially when the analysis has been done by a party with a vested interest in showing a particular result.

An assertion which you are welcome to prove. Or try.

Reply to
Mike Scott

One imagines (hopes) that a chip & signature card will still be accepted, and that the article refers only to retailers accepting a signature for a chip & *pin* card.

OTOH, shop staff training has been abysmal. Only this morning, a checkout lady in t***o told me "your pin hasn't been activated". It's a chip & sig card, and she gave me a very wierd look when I told her this.

Reply to
Mike Scott

There's nothing forgetful about being unable to use a keyboard.

Reply to
Poldie

"Poldie" wrote

What disability makes it difficult to use a keyboard, but easy to use a pen & write a signature?

Reply to
Tim

They previously said that credit card fraud had increased markedly in the period prior to C&P introduction... so the figure would be expected to fall back anyway. How does it compare with figures from previous years. Of cours they will try to distort the figures!

Putrid poetry, dismal doggerel, extrava-stanzas...

formatting link

Reply to
Tiddy Ogg

Perhaps I wasn't being clear then, I am unable to imagine any circumstances where someone can hold a pen to sign their name sufficiently to identify themselves, but not use a keyboard.

But as has already been stated, the article seems to refer to people who can use the chip and pin system, but don't because they can't be arsed, not because of any disability.

Reply to
Biscit

Poor eyesight (You don't need to look to scribble your signature, but you do to press buttons, check the onscreen messages etc).

Wheelchair user (can't reach the pin pads which are often fixed to the counter).

Bad memory (some people are number-blind).

Bad luck if you're not 'normal, eh?

Reply to
Poldie

I know.

If you can't see a keyboard then you can't use it. The keyboard is used in conjunction with a display, which you much be able to see. You also can't see if people are watching you type in your number. These aren't problems if you're signing something.

Reply to
Poldie

That may be the impression the article seeks to give, but "being arsed" is not, I think, a real problem for most people.

Rather, they have concerns over being "shoulder-surfed" (and let's face it, the protection against this offered with most keyboards, especially at supermarket checkouts, is woefully inadequate), and then, when denying responsibility for transactions they have not authorised, being told by their banks that "well, you *must have* knowingly disclosed your number, so it's your problem, not ours".

Although these concerns are legitimate, The System has failed even to recognise them, never mind address them.

Reply to
Ronald Raygun

Completely false. If you can sign your signature you can use the standard chip and pin keyboard.

Reply to
Biscit

No you don't. All keypads have raised buttons and can be used by anyone.

Only a problem in certain post offices.

So we make special dispensation for them.

Hey, I've got aspergers syndrome, what's your disability.

Reply to
Biscit

That's not my experience at all. I am (quite typically for my age) getting more long sighted, I can see distant things fine but I need glasses to read etc. Chip and PIN card entry keypads are a real pain to use for me whereas signing a slip is a doddle.

Reply to
usenet

So there's nobody in the UK who can't use a keypad, right? You need to make yourself more aware of the various disabilities that afflict people in the UK.

Incorrect. Many shops have fixed devices on the counter, or with insufficient cable to the box to be moved somewhere usable by some disabled people.

I'm not aware of that causing a problem with chip and pin entry. I don't have a disability - you're suggesting my consideration for those who do is misplaced?

Reply to
Poldie

If you can't see the total on the pin display then what chance have you got of reading the total on the paper signature slip?

Reply to
Adrian Boliston

At 13:23:51 on 10/10/2005, snipped-for-privacy@isbd.co.uk delighted uk.finance by announcing:

Do you have problems using the telephone?

Reply to
Alex

I'm suggsting you are a patronising so and so yes.

Reply to
Biscit

I can't see the pin pads, but manage... it's the security issue that's the problem.

Putrid poetry, dismal doggerel, extrava-stanzas...

formatting link

Reply to
Tiddy Ogg

BeanSmart website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.